Tuesday a judge in Broward County issued a temporary ban on citations or arrests for a controversial ordinance that outlawed most public food sharings in Fort Lauderdale; as a result seven people who had been on hunger strike to protest the rules could celebrate with a meal.
Dezeray Lyn is with Tampa Food Not Bombs. On her way to break her hunger strike, she took a few minutes Tuesday afternoon to stop by WMNF and tell us why she was striking and what she thought of the judge’s decision.
“The hunger strike was in response to the City of Ft. Lauderdale passing a series of ordinances. They’ve been termed ‘homeless hate laws’ that were making houseless activities impossible, making life more difficult. Amongst other things we were protesting the food sharing ban, which prohibited outdoor food sharing. So this was our response to that and our protest to that. And today there was a court hearing and a thirty day injunction was passed on the enforcement of that ordinance. So the seven hunger strikers currently are about to break their hunger strike.”
How long has it been since you’ve eaten?
“Nine days.”
//www.youtube.com/embed/vvtYQYwlGxE
Tell us about yourself and the other people who are on the hunger strike — and Jillian Pim, who broke her hunger strike.
“Jillian Pim is with South Florida Food Not Bombs. She was on hunger strike for 24 days. A sharp decline in her health caused her to step back from the strike and seven people took the strike from her. It’s been difficult. I’ve lost seven pounds in nine days. What we all went through, we all know that is nothing compared with what the struggling community in Ft. Lauderdale and cities all over the country are going through. We’re happy that we can break the hunger strike, we’re happy that people won’t be criminalized for sharing food but by no means is this over and by no means does it lessen at all the suffering of the people in Ft. Lauderdale. So I’m happy that the judge did the right thing, but I hope that the City of Ft. Lauderdale actually takes steps now to address – in some meaningful way – the suffering of the people that need them the most in their community.”
Is there any way to tell if the judge was influenced, or if the city is being influenced, by your actions?
“I don’t think there’s a way to tell because I don’t think that they’re letting it be known that they’re being affected by the resistance that’s being waged against them. I don’t see that there’s any way they couldn’t be. They’ve disgraced themselves globally. All eyes are on Ft. Lauderdale. People are shocked that they’re citing and a 91-year-old veteran could face prison over sharing food like he’s done for over two decades. So I think they’ve disgraced themselves. I don’t think there’s any way they couldn’t be feeling pressure over what’s going on. So, they’re not showing it, but I don’t think there’s any way that it couldn’t be affecting them.”
And finally, what do you hope will happen next?
“Like I said before, what I hope happens now – unlike the people that are on the streets in Ft. Lauderdale, I can eat now. I don’t have anything stopping me from being able to get a meal. The people that are struggling down there are in the same position that they have been all this time. We’re just asking that the city take steps – instead of criminalizing people that are providing social services, instead of making life impossible and compounding problems for the struggling communities there – we’re asking them to take action. Something real to fix the problems, to address the root problems of mental health, veterans with PTSD, the physically disabled, children, families, joblessness that are causing homelessness in their community.”